Association of Clinical Research Professionals (ACRP) Certified Professional Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the ACRP Certified Professional Exam with our comprehensive quiz. Elevate your clinical research skills with targeted flashcards and multiple-choice questions. Enhance your readiness with detailed explanations and insights for improved performance!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


According to ICH E8, how should methods for evaluating patient usage of a test drug be treated in the study protocol?

  1. Described orally to participants

  2. Specified in the protocol with documentation

  3. Outlined only after data collection is complete

  4. Not necessary for documentation

The correct answer is: Specified in the protocol with documentation

The requirement to specify methods for evaluating patient usage of a test drug in the study protocol is emphasized in ICH E8 guidelines, which focus on the need for a robust and well-structured plan that underpins the integrity and reliability of clinical trials. By documenting these methods in the protocol, researchers ensure that all procedures pertaining to patient usage are clearly outlined, allowing for transparency and consistency in data collection and analysis. This documentation is essential for several reasons. It promotes understanding among the study's stakeholders—such as regulatory agencies, institutional review boards, and participants—about how patient usage will be monitored and evaluated. Furthermore, detailed specifications within the protocol assist in upholding Good Clinical Practice (GCP) principles, ensuring that the trial adheres to ethical and scientific standards. This structured approach not only facilitates better management of the study but also aids in the reproducibility of results, which is critical for the integrity of clinical research. In contrast, the other options lack this rigor and clarity. Oral descriptions may lead to misunderstandings or inconsistent implementation, while delaying documentation until after data collection compromises the study's methodological transparency and reliability. Failing to document these methods could ultimately hinder the validity of the study findings and their acceptance in the scientific community.