Association of Clinical Research Professionals (ACRP) Certified Professional Practice Exam

In which scenario would a study's subject recruitment strategy require revision?

1. If subjects consistently express interest

2. If recruitment goals are consistently met ahead of schedule

3. If recruitment rates fall significantly below expected benchmarks

4. If subjects report satisfaction with their participation

The correct answer is: If recruitment rates fall significantly below expected benchmarks

A study's subject recruitment strategy requires revision when recruitment rates fall significantly below expected benchmarks. This scenario indicates that the current approach is not effectively attracting enough participants, which can jeopardize the study's validity, timeliness, and overall success. Low recruitment rates may suggest issues such as the study's eligibility criteria being too stringent, inadequate outreach to the target population, or a lack of awareness about the study among potential participants. By identifying this problem, researchers can assess their recruitment strategies and consider adjustments, such as increasing outreach efforts, modifying eligibility criteria, enhancing communication about the study's benefits, or offering additional incentives to encourage participation. Addressing this issue promptly is crucial to ensure that the study can still meet its required sample size and that the data collected are representative and reliable. In contrast, the other scenarios, such as consistent interest from subjects, meeting recruitment goals ahead of schedule, or subjects reporting satisfaction, indicate that the recruitment strategy is functioning well and does not require revision.